Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: combjelly who wrote (731892)	8/9/2013 12:23:09 PM
From: i-node	2 Recommendations Recommended By one_less TideGlider of 1576055

>> Fine. Six is a long way from 20 to 30. I think the jury could plainly see that Z wasn't counting. He didn't know how many times he had been hit, it felt like 25 or 30 to him. You are also conflating the slamming of his head on the pavement vs. the punches. A person can easily be punched 25 or 30 times without any visible sign of injury at all or with minor bruises and, in this case, a broken nose. Was it six or 30? Probably somewhere in between. It is neither here nor there. The only people who had a say in the verdict made their determination. It is clear it was not a case of nullification as in the OJ trial. The prosecution just didn't have any evidence. And in spite of the lying, cheating, and a judge who was clearly siding with the prosecution, they couldn't secure a conviction. Whether or not it was a righteous outcome, under our legal system it is what it is; you have prove conclusively someone committed murder before they can be convicted of it. The conclusive proof simply wasn't there.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next