SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Investing in Real Estate - Creative Opportunities

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John Vosilla who wrote (1877)8/10/2013 1:42:15 AM
From: Jurgis Bekepuris1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Smart_Asset

  Read Replies (1) of 2722
 
I disagree. You are one of the experts who can do it by themselves. I never bought or sold by myself and will never do it in the future. Sure, I'd love for 5% to go down, but if I have to pay, I'll pay it.

It's not about being an asshole. Out of the 3.5 transactions I have done so far, ALL required negotiations that would have been much harder without professional(s). Owners can be inexperienced, emotionally involved and make mistakes that a professional does not make. IMHO, at least half of these 3.5 transactions would have fallen through if they were direct owner-to-owner deals. And neither side would have benefited.

I also know the different model in Lithuania where (mostly - although this has been changing) there are no realtors involved. And IMHO the sellers lose from it. I've seen all the drawbacks that could be handled by realtor: crappily setup/presented houses/apartments, fights due to emotional involvement, badly prepared docs, etc. Sure, some transactions go through fine and people save. But the number of problematic ones is quite high.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext