SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
Sergio H
To: IndependentValue who wrote (52108)8/13/2013 8:38:57 PM
From: Paul Senior1 Recommendation   of 78747
 
WDC. For me, the way I'd look at it, if I were considering a buy, I'd say WDC is cheap on a roe:p/e basis. It's a buy.

Otoh, the stock is up near highs and it's not been a steady climb. If you bought in '09-late '12, depending when you bought, maybe you'd have to have held a couple-three years to see a decent gain (when the stock moved up from late '12.) Or trend-trade the stock.

finance.yahoo.com

So maybe this could again turn out to be one of those cheap stocks where fundamentals continue positively, yet the stock lags.

For me, I'd consider that this stock may have moved up with everything in the market, and may move down with it too, if the market corrects.

Another way I'd look at it is that I'd not want to pay more than 2x stated bv for the stock, based on some metrics/formula I sometimes use. That means I'd be nervous paying now about $68 for a 2xbv = $73 dollars. At $73 I might want to be a seller, depending.

Well that's how I look at it if I were to be a buyer now. However my buys were 9&10/ 2012, and I'm content to just continue holding. Which I'll do. Not planning to add to the position.

All jmo, given my situation/viewpoint. Others may see the stock differently.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext