Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 34.07

-1.9%

12:33 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: puborectalis who wrote (41643)	12/8/1997 12:03:00 PM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (3) of 186894

stephen,>>>Any comments on this (TK) bleak picture for '98?<<< IMO what Tom Kurlak does is not science and not mathematics. It is more like Riverboat gambling or meteorology. Sometime back, many of your top meteorologists on your local radio/TV stations were not trained meteorologists. Some were quite good. There was a guy in New York - "DOCTOR" Bob was one of the best. He claimed to have a doctorate but was really a school drop. Airline pilot swore by him. He continued to have a career even after he was exposed. My point is, whenever you are dealing with psuedo science, you will always run into people who have a run of good luck and will have a good following. However, like any good river boat gambler, luck doesn't last forever. Even in what we think are reputable fields, sometimes these things happen. As for examples, when was the last time that Henry Kaufman, Joe Granville, and Elaine Gazarelli have a large following. IMO the same thing will happen to Tom Kurlak. Tom Kurlak will be remembered long after Intel is forgotten - but not before then. Regards, Mary

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next