SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Effective Collaboration - Team Research for Better Returns:

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
Robert O
To: The Ox who wrote (2625)8/19/2013 12:25:14 PM
From: The Ox1 Recommendation  Read Replies (3) of 8247
 
I should add a bit more color to the post, as I can easily see BRCM making $3.20 next FY and 3.65 or more the following year. With this in mind, I have a 2 year price target that would be around $52/share ($43 on the low end and $60 on the high side).

These are back of the napkin numbers, so a grain of salt taken with them, so to speak. They are currently trading as though they deserve a mid-high single digit PE at best and I guess I'm simply too bullish by giving them a 13 or 15 PE for possible future earnings power.

I don't disregard what the market is saying, quite the opposite. However, I like to try and stay in front of it, especially when I think they are missing the boat on future earnings potential. INTC is in the same boat but I have a little more concern about them growing earnings at a mid teen eps growth clip. I think we'll see that a growing possibility but it may still be a year from now from INTC.

MRVL, ATML, BRCM, INTC and others in this space have gone through a major transition over the past 2 years. I think the market is currently looking backwards in this space, assuming that single digit growth is the best these companies can hope for. We'll see.....

EDIT - I am curious if looking at this post a year from now will make us laugh at my bullishness?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext