SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: koan who wrote (42905)9/7/2013 11:37:18 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) of 86356
 
Any person of intelligence would assume that any person of intelligence would never suggest one should listen to others speculations of cause and effect when their predictions based upon the speculated cause and effects have been correct 0% of the time. There are many different speculations on the cause and effects of long term climate change.

There have been no predicted effects supporting CO2 as the primary speculated cause. It does not matter if those doing the prediction are ditch diggers or nobel laureate scientists. It does not matter if there are 10 or a million saying the same thing. The specualtion's truth is tested by the observations over time.

The facts, the observations are simple to see to all intelligent opened minded people.

The stupid, those whose mind is clouded by some religious fever and the dishonest who can see some gain in fleecing the stupid and religious will not see the simple, but deny it.

You are the denier of science and the scientific method. Until you open you mind and look objectively at the facts, you are blind to the truth.

And to me if those whose opinion you so value are so stupid as not see how the MSU satellites are the most calibrated global observations of the Earth's temperature and still insist on CO2 after the years of existing data, they are brain dead in a large area of their skull.

And by the way, If the guy I suggest is the Top Climate Scientist is correct in his speculations on the
Global Warming as a Natural Response to Cloud Changes Associated with the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO)You will be left out in the cold.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News