SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (42993)9/7/2013 2:49:59 PM
From: Thomas A Watson1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Read Replies (1) of 86356
 
AGW is not based upon science. It is a speculative relationship based upon a speculative interpretation the effects of the absorption of electromagnetic radiation.

And so far 100% of the models predicting glowbal warming based upon the speculation of CO2 based speculative relationships driving global warming have been wrong, not even close.

100% of the speculative relationships have been falsified.

So what speculative relationship give some anonymous 97% a 95% confidence.

That is idiotic.

Alternative speculations on the causes of recent decades of global temperatures have been also dismissed by that anonymous 97%.

But in reality there is no anonymous 97% that has some 95% confidence in the IPCC propaganda.

It is delusion and some severe mental defect in the believers of that nonsense.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News