SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CSGI ...READY FOR TAKE-OFF!
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TEDennis who wrote (1484)12/8/1997 6:38:00 PM
From: tech  Read Replies (1) of 3391
 
Ted, did I ever state that the MOTOROLA project was put back into production ?

The Motorola project was completed in 8 days and the code was given to them so quickly that they were not even set up to test it.

ConSyGen has no control over how fast Motorola tests the code.

You keep trying to dismiss the Millennium project, but you fail to show me one press release that shows another company having successfully finished and successfully tested at year 2000 project.

You stated that CSGI identified 70% of the code as "for sure" while 30% had to be verified by the client.

Ron Bishop has said those figures are inaccurate and it is more like 95% / 5%.

You stated that PTUS, and SEEC can both automatically identify and convert code in a manner which not one single line of code has to be converted manually

According to both PTUS and SEEC, after the conversion is complete, there will have to convert some of the code manually.

Even SEEC's own web page states:

""Smart Change 2000 automatically generates renovated code. Comments are included in the code, showing which statements have been changed and which are "unresolved" and require manual inspection."

Oh, that's right, I almost forgot they can all automatically convert code without any manual intervention and CSGI is just in the middle of the pack.

However, none of them will say so.

Like I stated to Felt.

Even if we say that CSGI's tool is only as effective as SEEC and PTUS, it still means that CSGI's stock price is very undervalued as it compares to those two companies. i.e. once contracts are announced there should be no reason that the stock price will not move into a comparable range with the other companies who have similar technology.

but I don't have to tell you that, because after all, you just recently doubled your position.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News