Ted,
Regarding:
Millennium - I don't know if they have sold any or not, but I can check. Regardless, I have not been shown, or seen one other press release or news article that states a year 2000 project was successfully completed and successfully tested. I am still waiting for anyone to come forth with one.
Intentionally misleading - No, I did not mean to suggest that you intended to mislead anyone, but I have to say that when the numbers are 70 / 30 and you say CSGI is comparable to the others, then when we find out that the true numbers are 95 / 5, then they still can't just be comparable to the others.
PTUS & SEEC - All I know is what the people at those companies have said. CSGI doesn't have a problem saying that not one line of code is converted manually, but PTUS and SEEC both indicated that after the conversion is complete, some manual intervention is needed.
I guess that we will just have to agree to disagree about this.
You say that CSGI's tool is comparable to these other vendors and I believe that their tool may have some advantages.
However, even if their tool is similar, once contracts are announced this stock should move significantly higher.
I think we agree on the last point.
>>I'm getting tired of this game. Do you know of any others?<<
yes, here is one.
Given that you have twelve metal balls of identical size, one of which is heavier or lighter than the others, explain how, using a balance scale only three times, you can determine which of the balls
differs in weight from the others and whether it is lighter or heavier. |
