SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: koan who wrote (53265)9/13/2013 12:18:55 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 85487
 
The parents don't have a choice here, at least not if they can't afford to move to a better district, or to pay for a private school, or to take time off of work to home-school.

Political decisions have to be made and a democratic system is a better way to make them then the alternatives, but political decisions are not individual choices. The system (democratic or not) chooses, and people (whether they agree or not) are forced to go along.

Democracy is about how the political decisions are made (or more accurately the set up of the system that makes them), not about what areas get decided politically. A libertarian democracy is just as democratic (and more free) then a statist democracy.

Also democracy != state monopoly. Private schools, charter schools, tuition vouchers, tuition tax credits, and other methods to inject competition in to education are not in any way undemocratic.

What is undemocratic (which doesn't automatically mean wrong or bad, although those would also apply in this case) is trying to use the federal courts to ban the competition plan passed by the democratically elected local government.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext