SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc.
AAPL 273.40-0.1%Dec 26 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: slacker711 who wrote (159036)9/16/2013 9:13:11 PM
From: pyslent1 Recommendation

Recommended By
slacker711

  Read Replies (1) of 213177
 
At a glance, the iPhone 4, 4S and 5 are practically identical.

Car companies used to add fins to differentiate a new model year, even if the car was largely unchanged. The 5 is appreciably different than the 4/4S and yes, I would have thought that a new design would have all sorts of appeal due to this newness factor. By that logic, it was a surprise to see the growth between the 4S and the 5 to be so much slower than that between the 4 and the 4S.

The 5C could very well benefit from the newness factor, and certainly I expect Apple store foot traffic to increase due to 2 models getting the all out marketing blitz. But my guess is that the polarizing design of the 5C drives an inicrease in 5S sales, if anything.

In the hand though, the 5C has a really impressive, solid, feel (allegedly :) ).

BTW, the current 5 received a $100 price cut at Apple stores, matching the 5C pricing.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext