Your spelling mistakes are irrelevant to the accuracy of your assertions just as traffic stats are irrelevant to the truth content of any site whether it be Atheist or Christian, but you're desperate and drowning, so we understand why you cling so tightly to such obviously weak arguments.
"What he proposes is not science, thats clinging to the same old theology & myths, while in fact materialist science..."
LOL! To the contrary, it's Scientism that isn't "Science". You don't seem bright enough to understand that.
"Its not science to say its just impossible or too complex in his opinion, all he has is inferrence, belief & the appeal to a select few authorties & his incredulity."
You are intentionally misrepresenting his position, but again your obvious desperation is driving that.
Here is Meyer in his own words:
"Contrary to media reports, Intelligent Design is not a religious-based idea, but instead an evidence-based scientific theory about life’s origins—one that challenges strictly materialistic views of evolution..."
"Design is an inference from biological data, not a deduction from religious authority."
"Into that dynamic situation in evolution biology in which there is currently no consensus about the cause or mechanism of macro-evolutionary innovation, I propose the theory of Intelligent Design as an explanation for the origin of the novel information necessary to build novel forms of animal life."
- See more at: jonathanmerritt.religionnews.com |
