Ed: Read post 3499 and give credit where credit is due<G> Mark gets some too.
We were way ahead of the other copy cats with the X theory. My brother Phil has been watching the volume like a hawk, and I know the psychology behind a divorced woman's wrath. We put this theory together a long time ago. Perhaps the response should be " Nice post MR. ?, but Al Gutkin said that way back" <VBG>
It bugs me when someone posts something without reading the prior posts, the prior posts are a history lesson. All of the stuff that I said when I joined this thread have now been commented on and received critical acclaim. However, when I doubted the fundamental support of the stock, the stock was hitting the high of 32 so other members thought that I inhaled too much cat litter. Nobody could ever think that it could take such a beating as it is now. Maybe humerious accountants know something after all? Maybe not?<VBG> But, as you can see, humerious accountants did not pay attention to spelling in grammar school english class, but they know thier balance sheets<G>
Lets keep things in balance here<VBG>
Mark Leod, if you read this. Sorry, you did post the sec report, good job!! You didn't get credit for that. Keep the research up Mark, your work is appreciated.
Regards
wanting some respect Al |
