>> Every other nation in the industrialized world with nationalized health has not been "destroyed"
I cannot think of any way that would be relevant to the US experience (although I think your point is arguable, it just doesn't matter).
But Doug Elmendorf made it clear last week that our current budget is "unsustainable" due to Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare (and to a lesser extent, Social Security). No CBO director (particularly not a liberal Democrat) was saying that BEFORE Obamacare.
His comments were quite specific. These programs, and the interest cost on them, will break the country. Unless someone is willing to step up and make cuts to them. And no one is willing to do it.
Obamacare did NOTHING to control costs; costs are higher than ever. Elmendorf specifically mentioned the subsidies under Obamacare as major contributor to budgetary distress.
Now, let me put this as directly as possible for you and Ten:
Before Obamacare, budget difficult but sustainable. After Obamacare, budget unsustainable.
How is that NOT Obamacare "destroying the country"? Assuming, of course, that the inability of the federal government to pay its debts is equivalent to "destroying the country", which I believe it is.
When the federal, state, and local governments can't meet their obligations I'm not quite sure what you think is going to happen. But instead of an isolated disaster area like Detroit, it will be the same in Chicago, LA, and all the rest of them.
If that isn't 'destroying the country' I just don't know what is. |
