SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (742118)9/27/2013 3:01:31 PM
From: TimF1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Jorj X Mckie

  Read Replies (1) of 1574122
 
Maybe not, but if the cockpit doors been locked and armored as they are now, they wouldn't have been successful.

Now that might work. Pre 9/11 the hijackers could probably have gotten the pilots to open the doors by killing passengers and/or flight crew until the pilots gave up.

Of course they were poorly armed, and killing people might have gotten a violent response, so the attempt might have failed, and certainly locked and reinforced doors are a good idea, they just don't remove the utility of allowing pilots to be armed.

But let me remind you of the Egypt Air crash.......remember how the pilot nosed the plane down into the ocean muttering "allah akbar".... No gun would have stopped him.

That supports the argument for allowing pilots to have guns. The pilot doesn't need a gun if he wants to kill everyone on board. If the pilot is the terrorists your probably sunk. Your not increasing the danger in any significant way by letting pilots be armed. But you are increasing the pilots ability to deal with terrorists.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext