Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (742287)	9/29/2013 7:45:22 PM
From: SilentZ	Read Replies (4) of 1577853

>Reagan, Bush Sr., and Clinton. Maybe even Nixon if you stretch a little further beyond "our lifetimes." Yeah, right. Reagan had Lebanon and Iran-Contra, and neither he nor Bush I could stop meddling in Latin American countries where they had no business being. Somalia happened under Bush I and Clinton, and Rwanda happened on Clinton's watch. No, the second Iraq war was not a good move. Half a million people died (at least) and a quarter of the Iraqi populations was displaced. How is that in any sense a success? Obama was handed a horrible hand as far as foreign policy goes, and he's done OK. We're certainly become less involved as far as men on the ground go, and as I showed earlier, nearly every country in the world is happier with us than they were before he became President. He hasn't been perfect, but those things are better than what came before. If he had attacked Iran or Syria -- which I actually thought there was a good chance he would, I might think differently. And he still might. I was ready to turn on the guy in a minute, and it could still happen. -Z

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next