Just think how clever I would look if I had bailed at 5 bucks and gone short
there - but that would have been evil right? I was supposed to believe and hold
which - unfortunately - I did - ROTF
I never bailed at $5.00 either. In hindsight if I had known what I now know occured at $5.00 of course all of us would have bailed. For instance, did you know Shitsweeper even existed prior to their article? Would you have suspected that a little VSE stock would have ever attracted a crap rag like this? So while I had an upside of $5.65 if we could get over and hold $5.00 (which we never did) Shitsweeper was shorting the stock so they could then post their garbage.
What would have happened had SS not shown up? No idea, maybe $5.65 would have been doable. We will never know. However, none of the concerns raised by SS are an issue, period. They are fabricated opportunist BS writing to profit on a short.
The only people ever to raise a concern about ZEN are Riddle, who is FARKED if ZENs graphite is synthetic quality. Fulp, who has been paid $4K a month by flakers to promo their stocks and pooh pooh ZEN and finally NGC CEO who has to be one of the most loose mouthed people I have ever seen. There is an unwritten code between all VSE CEOs where "you don't shit in my backyard and I will not shit in yours".
This guy is so pissed he cannot get his shareprice up that he has stooped to breaking the only real code on the VSE lol
So just look who is bashing the stock, and ask yourself do they have vested interest in the bash?
As far as concerns at $5.00 what were they? I review my position weekly and $5.00 never was a concern unless you were trading the stock in which case a non-break of $5.00 would get us $4.40, which it did, then, suddenly the attack occured.
No one saw that coming, well at least I did not. You can control some things but not everything. it is what it is.
|
