SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
Thomas A Watson
To: koan who wrote (43944)10/11/2013 4:37:07 AM
From: Maurice Winn1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 86355
 
You have a great sense of humour too! You are obviously coming around to seeing the light. < I feel landshark is one of the sharpest minds on this thread.>

You obviously have not read about the principles of science espoused by Einstein, Feynman and Popper. Let's test you. What were they? To make it easier for you, one said all data should be included, one said it would take only one person to prove him wrong, no consensus needed. Even if all others said he was right, only one would be needed to show he was wrong. One said a scientific theory should be falsifiable. He meat that if data shows up which shows the theory is false, then it's game over for the theory. The theory should be able to be shown to be false. So if all data proves the theory, such as snow and no snow both prove the theory, cold and hot both prove the theory, wet and dry both prove the theory, sea levels rising or falling both prove the theory, snow accumulating or dwindling in Antarctica both prove the theory, then the theory is in the realm of magic, not science. Which one said which?

Landshark, being a resident genius, [having destroyed his own environment bequeathed by Len], should be able to guess the right answers.

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext