SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 375.93-1.8%Nov 14 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TobagoJack who wrote (103414)10/24/2013 6:32:41 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (2) of 217785
 
Maybe the Caesium and Iodine from Fukushima are a problem. I suppose I'll have to lumber into gear and do an analysis as I did with the BP/Transocean accident in the Gulf of Mexico, which told me that it was a trivial event [compared with the mass hysteria thinking] and that the worst of it was the lives lost and investment lost.

The Pacific Ocean is very big and Fukushima is very small. So I expect that as with the BP accident, it will be only a brief respite from the debacle that is Obamacare and the quadrillions of sloshing US$ in various forms waiting for Zimbabwe times.

Don't forget that as animals eat the radioactive nuclides, they sink when dead and become part of the vast sedimentary layers on the bottom of the ocean, kilometres thick. The biosphere is very very active.

That's my first guess. But then, when first guessing at the effect of lead in petrol, I thought it not a big deal, then read the scientific studies and concluded arrrgggghhhhh.... insane to put it in petrol.

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext