SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Digital Ally Inc. - DGLY
DGLY 1.710-3.4%9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: David Alan Cook11/1/2013 8:57:27 AM
   of 554
 
A confirmation of a nationwide trend. TASR and DGLY won't be able to make them fast enough. I clearly lean to DGLY because TASR is at 50 plus P/E and DGLY is undervalued and the better long term play. There seems to be alot of traders, but once the earnings and sale prove out, the Big money makers will be the longs IMO who hang onto a low float, major turnaround, undervalued, insider bought stock.
Cameras Could Restore Trust in Police

Neill Franklin is the executive director of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition. He was a narcotics cop and a commander of training during his 34-year career with the Maryland State Police and the Baltimore Police Department.

UPDATED OCTOBER 22, 2013, 4:44 PM

This urge to have eyes everywhere is not new. In the late 1700s, the philosopher Jeremy Bentham proposed a “panopticon” – a guardhouse in the middle of a circular prison, allowing guards to see all the inmates without being seen themselves. The idea was that, if the prisoners did not know when they were being watched, they would have to behave at all times as if they were, internalizing the gaze of the guard so that eventually, there would be no need for a guard at all.

When we train police officers, we work on a similar notion, telling recruits to conduct themselves as if they’re being followed by a video camera 24/7, because we know that they – like most people – behave better when they believe they’re being watched. While this is certainly a benefit for the communities in which they operate, it’s also a benefit for the police officers themselves.

A monitoring system could let us defend officers unjustly accused and punish those who are guilty. It could also reduce misconduct.

Cameras are extremely useful in gathering and maintaining a record of evidence, providing a fuller picture of an interaction than a written report or even a patrol car’s “dashcam” ever could. For this reason, they’re also very good at protecting police from false accusations of misconduct.

Since the advent of the war on drugs, we’ve seen a tremendous rise in racial profiling, unconstitutional searches and other dubious practices. At the same time, we’ve seen a tremendous decrease in public trust in law enforcement generally. The two are not unrelated.

The infamous “blue wall of silence” – the tendency of police to defend against any accusations of wrongdoing – has compounded the problem. But by adopting an objective, transparent monitoring system that allows us to defend those unjustly accused and correct or punish those caught abusing their power, we can prove to the public we believe no person should be above the law, particularly those sworn to uphold it. There are few things I can think of that would benefit our police more.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext