American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TimF who wrote (67868)	11/7/2013 9:27:21 AM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) of 71588

No, you have it backward... although your second paragraphs hits it yes... We could also say that just on our part if OUR INTENTION is that it's OK to allow certain areas to compete in various ways resulting in our production good X to move there that would also be fine. The Japanese rice/food example comes to mind, but of course ANY process or good deemed "important" would be the same thing... assuming you actually have what we call "a country", then NOT paying attention and regulating trade when needed may make you rely on another one for survival. Although true, of course, I don't imagine we'll here you address this little inconvenient truth... {crickets}. Of course who's ever running it will get kicked out eventually when the population sees what they are doing.... Unless you redefine "country". Of course as the eventual unfolds, all the RWingNutz will be kicking and screaming when the "protectionists" swing the pendulum the other way... and too far, just as has happened going the way it has. C'est la vie DAK

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next