SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
FJB
MichaelSkyy
TideGlider
To: RetiredNow who wrote (751857)11/8/2013 6:11:42 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie3 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) of 1575426
 
Your own logic is faulty. How do you know that climate change models have zero predictive value? The models that have been published have actually predicted the rise in average global temperatures, but they have UNDERestimated how fast they would rise.

sorry, global temperatures have been essentially flat for the past 15 years. Their models predicted significant increases in this time period. Do you really think that you can make shit up and not get called on it?

There's always a probability of that. It is science, after all.

why do you keep on saying that? Do you really believe that science is about probabilities? Maybe you can make an argument for man's ability to understand science is limited, so he has to rely on probabilities. But you can't equate science and probabilities.

One thing that we can do is move to higher levels of probability by defining what is certain. One thing that is certain is that the UN opinion that man is responsible for global warming, is wrong. They could add one word to make it true...but they didn't. And if you can't expect precision in their language, how can you expect precision in their science?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext