SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mel221 who wrote (752889)11/15/2013 5:41:30 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) of 1578047
 
Mel,
My point remains that 100% sequestered carbon is very bad for nearly every lifeform on this planet.
That's a silly statement to make given that we'll never reach 100% sequestered carbon.

But I think I get the point you're trying to make. When atmospheric carbon is treated like a "pollutant," the logical conclusion is that the less we have, the better.

The more logical statement would be that CO2 levels above a certain threshold should be treated as a "pollutant," but no one can say for sure what that threshold should be, only that "higher" is "worse."

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News