SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : IDPH--Positive preliminary results for pivotal trial of ID

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: I. Luttichuys who wrote (1394)12/10/1997 12:24:00 AM
From: Howard Hoffman  Read Replies (1) of 1762
 
<<I should add, Howard, that the cautious line would be to view SK's backing of the second generation anti-body as only marginally meaningful. I only say this because, at one time, SK backed the failed CE9.1 version as well. If something goes wrong with this one, they'll dump it too.>>

Bennett,

If anti-body is not promising, better to drop it. For example, Rituxan was not IDPH's first attempt at anti-body for Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma. The company figured that a non-radioactive product would be easier to administer. They switched to C2B8 (Rituxan) and now have an FDA approved product. Isn't it better to drop an antibody that may be marginal and concentrate on one with better prospects?

I understand that IDEC-151 has been single-dosed up to 1500 mg without evidence of CD4 depletion. This sounds very promising. It seems that this is a much better approach. Why would SmithKline go along for another round if they did not believe that this was better?
Short-term this is unlikely to have much impact on IDPH stock price, but it makes the long-term potential very interesting to me. What is the potential market for a successful drug for Rheumatoid Arthritis?

Howard
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext