SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JDN who wrote (7067)12/10/1997 9:06:00 AM
From: Jack Zahran  Read Replies (2) of 31646
 
B-Tree's product is complimentary. That is B-Tree's position. I have read that TPRO and B-Tree may work together to a degree. For all we know, TPRO may use B-Tree's product to help in testing components that are not in it's database. TPRO's product already has a collection of tested components which is continually growing. B-Tree's product is usefull in testing individual components for compliance. A combination of both is the most expediant. If most of the components in a companies plant has already been tested, then it would be a waste of time to re-test them and a whole lot more expensive. Using PlantY2KOne a plant will quickly identify non-compliant parts. After that, any parts not in the database will need to be tested. At that point TPRO's Westchester, NY branch will do the further compliance testing for I believe $150/hr. The Plant can choose to test the parts themselves using B-Tree's product, but the cost of the product and time involved (approval, acquisition, setup, training, then finally part testing) will probably make it cheaper for TPRO to do this one-time work. Why would a company want to set up a Y2K compliance testing site, if TPRO already has one going. Most companies today are hesitant to go outside their core competency.

However, TPRO could probably use B-Tree's product (if they are not already using it or something similar).

JZ
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News