SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: neolib who wrote (239542)12/7/2013 9:03:41 PM
From: Steve Lokness  Read Replies (1) of 541933
 
<<<< They were distinct lines, but everyone interbred at some point, so we have a bit of all of them >>>>

I think the word by itself - interbred - may be a bit oversimplified here. If the offspring is viable - that would make them the same species wouldn't it? Soooo, any interbreeding maybe was waaaay early in the co-evolution of the two species. When I say waaaay back I mean before we have examples of their DNA. ............More to the point; they didn't interbreed with an end result of one specie as the genes mixed but rather waaaay back interbred and did so less and less often as the two species separated going their individual way. Then they didn't breed any more. Like us and any mammal - if you go back far enough there is a convergence of like genes. What 90% of our genes are the same as another mammal - that doesn't mean we bred with them though - just have genes in common.

The end result; one specie ceased to exist as it became extinct, the other is doing rather great.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext