Conseco Insurance (CNO) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Conseco Insurance (CNO)

CNO 43.84

+3.7%

9:43 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ken Sammut who wrote (482)	12/10/1997 12:56:00 PM
From: hcm1943	Read Replies (2) of 4155

as a lurker let me offer up an opinion based on the fact that I have known RD over 20 years. He is not a one-hit-wonder his sucess spans the 20 yrs I've known him. While he has had his share of bad calls (Clinicorp comes to mind) his successes have been even more noteworthy (Greenwich Air aquired by GE, Digital Switch now DCS Comm, and most recently OXGN & OXGNW panned by both Dan Dorfman and Business Week days apart in '94 recently recommended by Prudential) Does he have aan agenda because of the fee he claims? perhaps but the points he makes are valid. BTW are the recommendations by the underwriters of the PRIDES motivated by the fees they will receive? I would suggest you and all the CNC bulls read the report objectively and ask CNC to respond point by point when they are out of the "quiet period". For those who are unaware of the fact the report is available at www.raydirks.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next