bruwin wrote: It really was my intention not to get embroiled in further activity and discussion on this Board because I did not wish to be part of, or associated with, the racist expression as was displayed in your post...
One of the many problems with egalitarians like you and other leftists, is that you and those of your ilk make definitive statements against positions that you disagree with, but it incenses you if the target of your comments dares to respond. Do you see how narrow-minded your comments are above? You are effectively saying that you had your say about me, but you didn't want me to respond to what you said. That is not the way that the freedom of speech works in my country.
With that said, you've talked at length about my country, so let's talk about yours now. With regards to South Africa, it was a far better and more civilized nation under White rule, was it not? Since that ended, it has become another gutter nation by all of the accounts that I have read and observed. Perhaps I was mistaken. If so, would you please enlighten me with evidence of how South Africa has become a better nation since apartheid ended and F.W. de Klerk ceded power to Blacks and left office?
From a logical perspective, every metric in existence clearly proves that the fewer Whites there are in a society, the less civilized the nation is and the poorer the standard of living is. This disparity is a function of intelligence, not imbalances in artificial wealth as leftists like to suggest.
The stark disparities that are exhibited by nations with declining Whites populations, and increasing non-White populations, certainly includes nations such as yours and mine that voluntarily ceded control to non-Whites. Racial diversity and multiculturalism are the death knells of peaceful and prosperous White societies. Every metric in existence logically supports my position.
Back in the 1950s, when the United States was well over 90% White, the White populace was large enough to effectively mask the deleterious effects associated with the presence of non-Whites. Today, with only a little over 62% Whites of non-Mestizo/non-Muslim lineage, it is no longer possible to mask the undesirable effects. This is part of the reason why the United States has crumbled and is increasingly in dire straits. The outlook is extremely grim as more and more Whites die off in the years ahead and the nation becomes increasingly uncivilized, dangerous, and savage-like.
Would you like to debate the facts related to race, intelligence, crime, and social outcomes? I am telling you for a fact, societies suffer and ultimately fall apart as White populations fall. The United States and South Africa are living proof of this. The very best nations on Earth are mostly White. The worst are mostly Black. It's that simple. Do you deny this?
For the record, but not that I particularly care about your opinion of me, I harbor absolutely no hatred of non-Whites. I am merely stating logical facts about the existing disparities. To wit, I strongly prefer to live in a nation where the overwhelming majority of people are like me. My feelings are completely natural and absolutely nothing to be ashamed of. Likewise, Blacks and Browns prefer to be with their own people, immersed in their own cultures. It is quite natural. In contrast, forced multiculturalism/diversity is extreme unhealthy and unnatural. I know that you probably cannot fathom that, but that's not surprising to me. You seem like an otherwise intelligent man, but because of your misguided and naive views of the world around you, you have my pity. You simply don't get it (understand), and I doubt you ever will. |
