Evolution Message Board - Msg: 29294901

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Brumar89 who wrote (44273)	12/22/2013 6:18:09 PM
From: 2MAR$	Read Replies (1) of 69300

Nabokov was right and the Darwinists who ignored and dismissed him were wrong, five out of five times.....Another totally dishonest article from your favorite skewed source. And Nabokov would hardly endorse these phonies today, his theory really involved the Blue Butterfly and origins of their migratory source. "Nabokov’s Blue Butterflies, New York Times" newyorker.com The genes that control coloration & pigmentation, various forms of mimicry & camoflage are observed in many other species, especially amphibians & many many ocean dwellers, are very well known, if anything this even more fully endorses evolution & natural selection criteria. Your people cannot be this stupid? If not, what is the magic mechanism that was proven again? Did these creatures "will themselves" to be this way? Or successive generations within that species that have relatively short fragile lifespans adapting over millions of years? Your "poof" theory goes poof once again.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next