SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Wi-LAN Inc. (T.WIN)
WILN 1.3900.0%Sep 18 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dexter Lives On who wrote (16528)1/2/2014 9:51:05 AM
From: Rob S.1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Dexter Lives On

   of 16863
 
This issue has been gestating for many years. The problem is that both ends of the spectrum from the largest companies to individuals who hold patents can be accused of abuse of the adversarial legal system of IPR enforcement.

The USPTO is the crux of the problem: It starts with Congress that has treated it as a cash cow to plunder the fees generated rather than allow USPTO to build up their staff and processes to assure that patent filings are given full review including a more thorough examination of the prior art. As a result, the patent office has issued many patents, imo, that should never have been granted. The prior art and claims reviews can be sloppy and skilled patent attorney's have found ways to 'game the system' such as by citing numerous prior art while failing to list that which is most damning. The overworked staff rolls over imo.

That situation has been brewing since before Wi-LAN was established. The impact is that legitimate patent prosecution firms are cast in the same light as abusers byu orchestrated efforts of the large companies and their reform lobbyists, organizations and the tabloid industry media.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext