Research Frontiers (REFR) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Research Frontiers (REFR)

REFR 1.700

+4.7%

Nov 18 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (8168)	1/3/2014 8:12:55 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	4 Recommendations Read Replies (2) of 50175

The nanocrystal and microblind technologies look very interesting. Yes, and it's odd that N* would link to them. Does she think they're talking about SPD? Does she not realize that these technologies on the horizon represent the end of the line as far as SPD's usefulness when they eventually come to market? Is she just gloating that they're years away so that in theory REFR still has time to make some money? Does she think that Harary's patents will entitle REFR to siphon royalties off this tech as well? SPD, no matter how many times N asserts to the contrary, is not and has never been nanotechnology. The particle size of SPD, as described in numerous patents, is an immediate disqualifier, and on top of that the attempt to portray it as such show a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of nanotechnology. Merely changing color and translucency is nothing compared to the potential of actual nanotechnology. *Henceforth I am going to refer to her as "N"; that being the first "word" in her handle. I doubt even she can concoct a way to object to being referred to by her own chosen handle.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next