SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
FJB
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (45741)1/7/2014 3:56:25 PM
From: Thomas A Watson1 Recommendation  Read Replies (3) of 86356
 
I have no reason to question that the following is an accurate rendition of Dr. Lindzen's opinions.

Earth hasn't warmed as much as expected Lindzen's EvolutionIn his 1989 MIT Tech Talk, Lindzen summarized his many climate contrarian positions at the time:

  1. the surface temperature record is wrong
  2. global warming is not a concern
  3. climate sensitivity is low
  4. the water vapor feedback is negative
  5. the cloud feedback is negative
  6. global warming is just due to internal variability
  7. water vapor is the most important greenhouse gas
There is no data that Or
Dr. Lindzen;s opinion.

Anyone who comprehends the meaning of the world Global knows, Satellite data is the only Global temperature data.
The measurements as presented by Dr Roy Spencer and the Fourier analysis of Past Temperatures correlated with planetary cycles add support to Dr. Lindzen's opinions, especially CO2 climate sensitvity is low if not non existent.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News