Politics of Energy Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

Blasher

To: Land Shark who wrote (45795)	1/8/2014 12:24:26 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	1 Recommendation of 86356

Why that article is logically stupid. It uses the term Climate Denier. What the hell is a Climate Denier. Does the one person deny the Climate changes. As to Man Made, I know of no scientist or individuals who dispute the burning of fossil fuels had added to the increase in CO2 in the 20th century. But they do deny CO2 has some magic green house gas effect orders of magnitude greater than it's know physical properties. CO2 is a trace gas with small green house gas property vs H20. H20 by molecule is an order of magnitude more potent in green house gas property. H20 in the atmosphere is orders of magnitude more numerous than CO2 and varies by orders of magnitude over the trace 4 part in 10,000 of CO2. So whatever the total greenhouse gas effect of the atmosphere is. By mass or quantity times green house gas property, H20 is 99.999% of the effect. The change of doubling C02 may have some .000? effect overall. SO WHAT! Look at what dew point means in terms of H20 PPM. In the tropics where there is a surplus of solar in vs radiation out what is the dew point.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next