SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (762472)1/8/2014 11:55:43 PM
From: TimF1 Recommendation

Recommended By
i-node

  Read Replies (1) of 1574852
 
Whatever gets the money back here and into circulation.

A corporate tax rate of zero would be the best way to do that, barring that a corporate tax rate that was highly competitive with most of the rest of the world, lower than the average.

The point about taxes on distributing the profits was important because while I want to avoid double taxation of this money, it should be taxes once (ideally at a lower rate than today's rate).

An alternative would be to make dividends tax free for the recipient, but as long as the corporation still has to pay the taxes on the money it brings back before it can use it for dividends, that likely wouldn't have as much effect as the zero corporate tax rate. If you set the rates right, both taxes could be equivalent for the owners, but the corporate decision makers probably care more about the reported profits (esp. since they might have bonuses based on them, and also because a large one time dividend isn't likely to have the same type of positive effect on the stock prices as higher profits from less (or no) corporate taxes), and stock prices help determine how profitable the executive's options are.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext