| | | N.Dixon,
I am going to apologize to you. When you insinuated that I was Ms B*****g, rather than deny it as I have done in the past when you have accused me of being other people, I decided to run with it. If you read my post, it really doesn't make a lot of sense unless you google the name that you posted. If you do, you will see that there is a woman who has the same name who is a blogger and uses the reference to "tomatoverse". There is a character on Downton Abbey with the same name who has a romantic interest with a guy named Tom Branson. And yet another artist in Melbourne, Australia with the same name. I referenced tidbits about all of them in my post to you thinking that you were just trying to mess with me. And if you cross reference her name with the name that has been associated with you, the first thing listed on google is a review of that person's services by a person using the same name that is associated with you.
I am absolutely convinced that you are not a paid stock promoter. Yes, I believed that you were at one time. You are obviously a very enthusiastic investor who is promoting the stock which you have invested in based on your faith in the company's management.
I urge you to discontinue posting identifying personal information about yourself or your friends or family. I know that you have googled "Jorj X McKie" along with the names of other people that you have seen as adversaries. You should have seen how much information can be found on google if you search the right thing.
I am not posting this as someone who is your friend. You don't know me, I don't know you. And we don't know any of the same people. We have different views on pretty much everything (though your music tastes aren't too bad). The only thing that we have in common is right here, right now...silicon investor. I am posting this as a person who sees himself as a decent guy who wouldn't knowingly hurt someone for the sake of hurting that person. And in fact, I see myself as someone who would defend or protect a weaker person from abusive actions.
I see this conversation going in a very bad direction at this point. Names of people who should never be affected by a silly message board are being thrown around. Very serious accusations are being made. I have no idea to the veracity of any of it. I don't want to know.
In the end, none of us have misrepresented ourselves. We have all been posting based on our interpretation of the motives of the others when the actions didn't make sense to us. We all do that. We all try to come up with explanations for things that don't make sense to us. Your enthusiastic support of REFR didn't make sense to me or others on the thread based on the financial performance of the company or some of the actions of the executives. Since this didn't make since, the obvious explanation is that you must be on their payroll in some way. You have full faith in the technology, company and management of REFR so you didn't understand why we would be so negative about the stock or your enthusiastic support of it. So you came up with many different scenarios that would explain our actions.
We were all wrong. You are who you say you are. I am who I say I am. Our motives are what we have said all along.
This is my last post to you. It is my last post about you. It is my last post about REFR. It is my last post on this or any other REFR thread.
Please understand that, if you choose to respond to this message, though I will see it, I will not respond.
I wish you well. |
|
