Hi koan; Re: "At least I am able to figure out global warming which you apparently cannot. I'll bet you get your information from Roger Ailes FOX production. Talk about a propaganda machine! Much better than scientists. Huh-lol?";
This is a good illustration of how your side lost the argument. Instead of giving me a link to a peer reviewed scientific paper, the best you can come up with is an attack on me personally. This is where the alarmists pretty much always end up going and it's why you always lose the public debates. So for quite some time, the warmists tried to prevent debate by preventing the other side from being allowed to speak. You're basically like the Nazis; you have an agenda and your agenda is stupid, so you try to use force to control the media. And now it's falling apart on you.
Let me explain something about logic to you. The reason I can persuasively argue that you're stupid is by providing evidence for it. If all I did was state that you're a moron, my arguments would be just as weak as yours. Same thing applies to "I am able to figure out global warming", LOL. If you want to make persuasive arguments, you have to "show them not tell them".
Your basic problem is that you are too stupid to be able to distinguish the difference between "the prejudices and beliefs of your friends and relatives" and "science". And I don't think there's anything I can do about it, you're quite hopelessly mired in your belief system.
But the fact that you constantly have to rewrite history, and parrot silly arguments, and quote net garbage to buttress your case *is* fairly entertaining and I will continue to make fun of you. My favorite part is watching the mainstream media slowly, oh so very slowly, turn against you. You must be coming up with some entertaining explanations for all this, do share them with us!
-- Carl
P.S. I have to say that my favorite episode is having half of your side denying that global temperatures paused while the other half admits the pause but then claims that temperatures are going to rise later. What you're doing is proving that not only is the science is unsettled, but that your side is so stupid that they can't even get their excuses straight.
And I think your confusion is good evidence against the common lunatic right wing belief that global warming theory is all a conspiracy. Hey, if it were a conspiracy surely you'd be able to get your press releases straight, LOL. No, the whole thing is basic bad science, fueled by the left-wing tendencies of academics (who can survive only by sucking on the government tit). |
