SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (46445)1/22/2014 1:34:26 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (2) of 86356
 
rat, I will congradulate you on attempting to make a reasoned argument. it fails miserably, but at least it's not some personal attack.

However due process in science, is by prediction, test, observation, and repeat.

And CO2 does not and never retained heat. It functioned in a manner of speaking as an increase in insulation that only delayed the movement of heat from hot to cold.

All satellite observation now confirm that the increase in insulation of C02 and the delay of heat predicted it would cause in heat moving from hot to cold is no where near anything predicted by what equations of math modelling of that predicted cooling delay. AKA the speculated sensitivity of global temperature to the CO2 partial pressure.

In fact the cooling delay cannot be seen at all

I have no idea what the Isthmus of Panama has to do with CO2. CO2 does not shift continents.



Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News