Just for the record, Michael, I wasn't "throwing barbs" at Bill. Actually, I respect the fact that he publicly changed his mind. And, at the end of the day, I even agree with his decision to start his own thread. It was long past obvious by that point that the discussions at FADG were going nowhere and were just repetitive silliness.
That being; moderators who ban members of SI should not openly discuss banned members once they've been censored from responding. I find the practice childish.... I have no idea of your opinion on the matter, since you haven't offered one.
FWIW, my opinion is -- I don't really care what people say about me on a thread that I have been banned on. Or, really, anywhere else on SI. So if someone wishes to waste his/her time spouting off about me, that is up to them. Moderator or not.
However, you do participate on a thread moderated by someone who performs such acts on a regular basis and your cheerleader John openly supports the practice on that same thread.
What's that old saying? "A man is known by the company he keeps".
Gosh, Michael, you really know how to hurt a guy. Boohoohoo, I don't know if I will be able to recover if you don't get banned, lol. |
