Ralf D. Tscheuschner and Gerhard Gerlich are theoretical physisists as was Albert Einstien. Their orgional paper as Version V4 was publish peer reviewed in 2009. In 2010 some chemists published a peer reviewed put down. In 2010 Ralf D. Tscheuschner and Gerhard Gerlich, theoretical physisists publish peer reviewed evisceration of the chemists.
Since 2010 no peer reviewed publication has attempted to contradict any assertions or conclusion of Ralf D. Tscheuschner and Gerhard Gerlich, theoretical physisists. yes all manner of rat brained loonies from the green coolaid blogs have babbled on and on about physics the is miles over the heads.
Reply to Comment on `Falsi cation Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse E ects Within The Frame Of Physics'
by Joshua B. Halpern, Christopher M. Colose, Chris Ho-Stuart, Joel D. Shore, Arthur P. Smith, Jorg Zimmermann"
Version 1.00 (December 1, 2010)
Gerhard Gerlich
Institut fur Mathematische Physik
Technische Universitat Carolo-Wilhelmina zu Braunschweig
Mendelssohnstrae 3
D-38106 Braunschweig
Federal Republic of Germany
g.gerlich@tu-bs.de
Ralf D. Tscheuschner
Postfach 60 27 62
D-22237 Hamburg
Federal Republic of Germany
ralfd@na-net.ornl.gov
Abstract
It is shown that the notorious claim by Halpern et al. recently repeated in their comment
that the method, logic, and conclusions of our Falsi cation Of The CO2 Greenhouse E ects
Within The Frame Of Physics" would be in error has no foundation. Since Halpern et al.
communicate our arguments incorrectly, their comment is scienti cally vacuous. In particu-
lar, it is not true that we are \trying to apply the Clausius statement of the Second Law of
Thermodynamics to only one side of a heat transfer process rather than the entire process"
and that we are \systematically ignoring most non-radiative heat ows applicable to Earth's
surface and atmosphere". Rather, our falsi cation paper discusses the violation of funda-
mental physical and mathematical principles in 14 examples of common pseudo-derivations
of ctitious greenhouse e ects that are all based on simplistic pictures of radiative transfer
and their obscure relation to thermodynamics, including but not limited to those descriptions
(a) that de ne a \Perpetuum Mobile Of The 2nd Kind", (b) that rely on incorrectly cal-
culated averages of global temperatures, (c) that refer to incorrectly normalized spectra of
electromagnetic radiation. Halpern et al. completely missed an exceptional chance to formu-
late a scienti cally well-founded antithesis. They do not even de ne a greenhouse e ect that
they wish to defend. We take the opportunity to clarify some misunderstandings, which are
communicated in the current discussion on the non-measurable, i.e. physically non-existing
in uence of the trace gas CO2 on the climates of the Earth.
Electronic version of an article published as International Journal of Modern Physics B,
Vol. 24, No. 10 (2010) 1333{1359
, DOI No: 10.1142/S0217979210055573,
c
World Scienti c Publishing Company,
worldscinet.com
. |
