ratty, do you check the dates on the blog links of whatever review you post. The date is a very simple fact too check. Well maybe to dishonest trolls anything said supporting their religeous doctrines any time is true forever. In rational logical honest arguments, What is in 2010 overules what is alleged to have been in 2008. You make Michael Mann proud.
The most elegant analsysis of Halpern's hilarity is here. chriscolose.wordpress.com The blog's author is pro Halpern I believe but the best analysis posted is by
Terry Oldberg | May 14, 2010 at 3:08 pm | Reply Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the 2010 article of Halpern et al (hereafter collectively referenced as “H”).
In the abstract to their article, H state that Gerlich and Tscheushchner (hereafter collectively referenced by “GT”) “…claim to have falsified the existence of an atmospheric greenhouse effect.” This statement is prone to being misunderstood for, as GT demonstrate in their 2009 article, the literature describes many such effects. In their article, GT claim to have falsified all such effects that had been described at the time of publication of this article.
One of these effects is described by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR) at (
windows.ucar.edu ). UCAR references this effect as “the greenhouse effect.” While GT claim to have falsified “the greenhouse effect,” H argue GT have done no such thing. In the following remarks I argue that H’s argument fails from its violation of a principle of logic......
..... ....... ......
It has been proved that, in the terminology of H’s argument, the “back radiation” is a flow of heat-t and is not a flow of heat-t. On the basis of this contradition H’s argument logically fails, from its violation of the law of non-contradiction.
====================================================================
This is the full listing of what I know of as Peer Reviewed articles on Falsification.
It seem the PDF links from IJMP are not simply available.
However the GERHARD GERLICH, RALF D. TSCHEUSCHNER papers are available from.
arxiv.org  reply to Halpern comments.
toms.homeip.net is the original.
I see no junk from GERHARD GERLICH, RALF D. TSCHEUSCHNER, only percise definitions and expanations of what physics is and what making it up is.
 |
FALSIFICATION OF THE ATMOSPHERIC CO2 GREENHOUSE EFFECTS WITHIN THE FRAME OF PHYSICS
GERHARD GERLICH, RALF D. TSCHEUSCHNER
International Journal of Modern Physics B Vol. 23, No. 03, pp. 275-364
Abstract | References | PDF (1714 KB) | PDF Plus (1359 KB) |
|
|
REPLY TO "COMMENT ON 'FALSIFICATION OF THE ATMOSPHERIC CO2 GREENHOUSE EFFECTS WITHIN THE FRAME OF PHYSICS' BY JOSHUA B. HALPERN, CHRISTOPHER M. COLOSE, CHRIS HO-STUART, JOEL D. SHORE, ARTHUR P. SMITH, JÖRG ZIMMERMANN"
GERHARD GERLICH, RALF D. TSCHEUSCHNER
International Journal of Modern Physics B Vol. 24, No. 10, pp. 1333-1359
Abstract | References | PDF (712 KB) | PDF Plus (721 KB) |
|
