Evolution Message Board - Msg: 29360319

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Greg or e who wrote (45801)	1/30/2014 3:04:30 AM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) of 69300

"Therefore, all we can do is assert the true claim that there has never been one shred of evidence to support any of the gods..." <<Therefore? You think you're making some kind of logical connection with your unsupported assertion>> No. I know I am making the logical connections to all my supported assertions. All the gods were invented in ignorance and fear, and remain for the same reason. They have all been imaginary. Originally the gods were heroic and very powerful combinations of men and Nature elements. They were able to intervene in the affairs of Man and the affairs of Nature--to help or to hurt. As the human mind and the human reach expanded it became both natural and necessary to make our gods more powerful. So we took away their bodies--because this was a conditional attribute. It was not seemly to have gods in battles and being shredded and then needing to be resurrected and animated all over again. Eventually, our gods became so powerful that they became pure spirit and quite invisible! Weak thinkers with an atavistic, superstitious bent will claim that god is real. But they have no evidence for this assertion. They define a god and then they define him into existence. All rather silly! But even sillier is their claim that our inability to absolutely disprove the existence of this magical being may be regarded as a proof of his existence! Nothing could be more sillier. Weak and dishonest thinking. An invisible, magical god (as we so conveniently define "HiM" (CHUCKLE!) is no more capable of being disproven ABSOLUTELY than a unicorn can be disproven. Unicorns can also hide from all the evidence! .therefore, (if we think like superstitious weaklings)...THEY EXIST!!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next