SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
bruwin
dealmakr
To: Jurgis Bekepuris who wrote (53282)2/1/2014 9:00:22 PM
From: Spekulatius2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 78748
 
Re ADT - the story has several suspect twist that make me think that a SEC investigation is warranted:

1) an activist hedge fund investor (ex Icahn guy) comes in with a large stock position and twist management arm inti buying back stock.
2) the activist get's a board seat and ADT buys back his shares 6 month later (announced on 11/25/2013, close to the top), at which point the activist resigns his seat.
3) there is a huge short position in this stock, despite all those buybacks.
4) On 1/31/2014, or just 2 month after the activist sold his shares to the company, the wheels come off.

So the question is - did Corvex learn something, while he sat on the board? How come there was a huge short position in this stock, shorts have a bear thesis...
If shorts know something, the board must have known something too, including Corvex...This could be a huge insider trade basically, with several hundred million in profit (or loss avoidance)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext