SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: koan who wrote (767968)2/4/2014 6:43:24 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) of 1577355
 
<<"And so which god is it exactly your evidence proves." >>

Apparently you are not able to follow what I have written in plain English numerous times. In a nutshell, I have argued that your conclusion (based on no hard facts) does not prove what you claim it does (there is none). This is the one and only point I've made.

I have repeatedly corrected your mistaken presumption that I would attempt to prove God. It wouldn't matter if it were all 10,000 or one ... re-read these responses:


I was not attempting to, and cannot prove God for someone else. (Post # 767941)

I have not tried to prove that there are hard facts as you define that term, I have tried to demonstrate that your conclusion is flawed: (Post 767907)

The kind of fact you are demanding involves physical evidence, which of course is ludicrous. Belief in God is a faith based notion not a hard facts based issue. Based on arguments like these, attempting to prove God is a fool's errand. (Post 767258)

1st I have never claimed to be able to prove anything about existence.
2nd if you want to discuss evidence of any all powerful God, you have to consider the idea in a realm beyond physical existence and beyond any concepts involving time and space. (Post 767170)

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext