| | | In regards to your first paragraph, no. I'm not familiar enough with the display maker interactions with mobile device makers to shed some light on this situation. Sorry. … Nor do I enjoy engaging in hypotheticals out of context to current conditions. When projecting future trajectory, I like to start with the status quo and go from there.
As to your second paragraph, I know what your stated agenda is. As you can see by my quoted statement, I just don't believe it. I believe you have something to bring to the table. I just don't think you're doing it. You are simply baiting a feigned discussion in order to present your intractable views. Having presented them so many times, your answers have become monolithically established within a well defined framework.
In fact, I might conjecture that the unswerving viewpoint you project is perhaps due to some other factor than your very own opinion. You might be Asian, and you might be a well educated executive for one of the many corporations supporting and competing within this fine industry. If so, I complement you on your English. It is very good!
Oafish is an adjective that means clumsy. It is derived from a well used expletive usually shouted after someone breaks something, "You clumsy oaf!" Since technically a viewpoint can't be clumsy, it simply means in this context, misses the mark. I used it because in your scenarios you start your analysis with hypotheticals so deviant from current known values.
I might add that, even though I have you on ignore to facilitate keeping up with the thread, I'm getting a good deal of your content from the quoted references in the reply posts of your conversations. |
|
