SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (768730)2/11/2014 2:47:38 AM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (2) of 1577224
 
>
Implied in that argument is the notion that government is entitled to a sizable portion of income above a threshold that meets an average person's "basic needs."

Well, a sizable portion of income way beyond that threshold.

>Hence, there is little room to save, little room to invest, little room to bequeath, little room to do anything but trust government to lay out the future of society.

Is this what happened in the 1950s? And there is too much room to save, to invest, to bequeath... The top 1% are making like 80% of capital gains. Are you going to tell me that this country would be horribly affected if that number were *GASP* only 60%?

>What's really funny is that, in your vision of an ideal society, one's "basic needs" would be fulfilled by government services, which essentially puts that income threshold at zero. Makes me wonder who can ever work for something that he or she can call his own.

Except I didn't say anything like that. I said having basic needs "far since met." Almost everyone can have his/her basic needs met, save for in the most expensive parts of the country, for under $100K a year. Probably like $50K. So is it so terrible to tax a couple more percent on income that's 5-10X that?

-Z
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext