SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
Tenchusatsu
To: TopCat who wrote (769569)2/14/2014 3:30:43 PM
From: steve harris1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 1574056
 
I do not view the police stopping a criminal in the process of executing a crime as being the same as assassinating an American Citizen that produces some youtube videos. We're back to discussing is a policeman shooting a criminal acting as judge and jury? Sure, the criminal has a knife to someone's throat, sure, blow him away.

Is there a point you would change your view? A president using drones in Dallas? Waco? Ruby Ridge?

Here's a good read from a left wing site:
cnn.com

I would highlight these passages:

Critics, however, say the government oversteps the legal boundaries of the Constitution and international law, particularly by making decisions on targeted killings in secret without going before any court.


Hina Shamsi, who directs the ACLU's National Security Project, told CNN that the Obama administration was "fighting hard" to prevent a judicial review of the strikes that killed al-Awlaki and the other Americans, including the terrorist's 16-year-old son.


U.S. District Judge John Bates called it "somewhat unsettling" that a president could -- for national security reasons -- make a unilateral decision to kill a U.S. citizen overseas and the decision would be "judicially unreviewable."
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext