SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 50% Gains Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Steve Felix who wrote (117952)2/19/2014 2:45:22 AM
From: ElroyRead Replies (1) of 118717
 
If they don't trade together why would shorts have to supply warrants?
It isn't like they were attached to stock owned on a certain date.


Come on Steve, you're not thinking about this. Warrants were issued to all long MHR holders on a specific date back in September last year. At the time 30% of the long shares were shares bought from shorts that had borrowed them from actual long holders. Those 30% received warrants. From where did these additional warrants come? Does the short synthetically create them?

Essentially we got a dividend. A dividend with no current value.

Yes, the warrants are $8.50 strike call options. Does a person short MHR have the ability to just create an $8.50 call option and give it to the MHR shareholder he sold to? Maybe. If it were a normal cash dividend, he would have to poney up the dividend. But that's just cash. Does a short just poney up his own $8.50 call option/warrant?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext