SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bread Upon The Water who wrote (245423)2/24/2014 6:44:37 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) of 542139
 
To me, three of the four statements are clearly lies, which you've probably picked up from your daily WSJ. The only one I'm not sure about is the out of wedlock birthrates. I don't recall Obama promoting that, or being responsible for it. Looks to me like we NEED every baby we get:

Baby bust: U.S. births at record low

By Annalyn Kurtz @AnnalynKurtz September 6, 2013: 10:59 AM ET



http://money.cnn.com/2013/09/06/news/economy/birth-rate-low/


If it's true that a larger % are out of wedlock, I'd suggest that as women have better jobs and are more financially secure, they probably feel more free to fulfill their biological function of having babies, husband or no. I wonder if they're counting lesbians? I know several lesbians with children.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext