COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF

COMS 0.00160

0.0%

Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Larry Tomblin who wrote (10533)	12/11/1997 9:05:00 PM
From: David Lawrence	Read Replies (1) of 22053

I'm interested in your take on USRX/COMS as they appear to be left out in the cold, or not? An apparent coming ratification of 56KFlex technology is a big plus for Lucent and Rockwell into ITU specs. is big news today. What are your talking about, Larry? Contrary to Rockwell's rhetoric, Lucent clearly stated that there was an equal mix of both protocols adopted into the draft standard. How do you figure that is a ratification of 56KFlex [sic]? I believe 3Com and Lucent cut a deal to make it happen. They're the guys with the code, and the best hardware implementations of 56k. The 3-legged K56Flex horse (MOT/LU/ROK) now has only one leg. We'll see how well they (ROK and minions) adopt and adapt to the ITU standard.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next