SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TideGlider who wrote (775486)3/18/2014 10:08:20 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell2 Recommendations

Recommended By
joseffy
TideGlider

  Read Replies (2) of 1582943
 
The fire theory makes sense in and of itself. The problem is whether it indeed fits the known facts. If NBC news is correct in their sources about the flight change being made 12 minutes prior to the co-pilot calmly signing off, it pretty much kills this theory dead in its tracks.

OTOH, if for sake of argument we assume the flight change was made after sign-off, then we have a plane with such a dreadful fire on-board such that there was not even time for crew or passengers to make any distress calls (recall they flew back over Malaysia where there were cell towers and radar) -- yet for some reason this engulfed plane (with either acrid smoke from a fire below or flames from above) is able to fly for another 4-5 hours, which we are being told it did.

However, if indeed the pilots or others hijacked the plane, unless there were a great many cohorts onboard to subdue the passengers, once again you would think we'd see evidence of distress, which again we do not. The bottom line is that any theory is only as good as the facts it is based on, and all this time later we are apparently still lacking a solid set of facts.

- Jeff
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext